Even more so if you consider

shafi543@gmail.

The other analysis has another perspective. Structure, technical competence and quality Does the site have duplicate, overlapping, redundant articles or cover similar topics with just keyword variations? Does the article have grammatical errors, style errors, or false citations? Is there quality control in content production? Content is mass-produced, outsourced to a large number of creators. Or is it spread across a large network of websites so that each page does not receive individual attention or care? Was the editing of the article done well or carelessly? Is this the kind of page you would bookmark, share with friends, or recommend? The article has an excessive amount ofadvertsthat distract or interfere with the content? Do you think this

article has the quality to be in a printed magazine, encyclopedia Asia Mobile Number List or book? Are the articles short, superficial or non-specific? Are the pages produced carefully and with attention to detail? Would users complain when they saw pages on this site? Analysis to choose the first search results It is said that more than analyzes are carried out to rank content. It's incredible to think that all of this was translated into a mathematical formula, the so-called algorithm, which can, in a very precise way, answer these questions, analyze several other factors and also present a list of results organized in order of relevance. that all of this is done in hundredths of a second. What's more, there is an analysis of objective, technical factors,





such as number of words, shares and visits, as well as subjective factors, such as reliability, care, quality... In another article Brazilian Digital Marketing x American Internet Marketing , I said “… I write for people. I leave website optimization for better search rankings at a secondary level of importance, as I notice that searches are intelligent enough to consider my stance as a focus on producing original and relevant content.” At the time, some people considered that, by saying that SEO was secondary, I considered it unimportant, when, in fact, I really meant second place, since my first concern was with the content.